主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (6): 10-16.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2020.06.002

• 鉴定制度 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术事实认定的二元机制研究——兼论技术调查官的制度张力

易旻1，胡泽斐2   

  1. 1.西南政法大学 重庆高校物证技术工程研究中心，重庆 401120； 2.重庆市渝中区人民检察院，重庆 400010
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-15 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 作者简介:易旻(1965—)，男，高级工程师，硕士研究生导师，主要从事司法鉴定学、物证技术研究。
  • 基金资助:
    2016年重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYS16105)

The Conception of Binary Mechanism on Fact Recognition — the Institutional Tension of Technical Investigation Official

YI Min1, HU Zefei2   

  1. 1. South West University of Political Science and Law, Research Center of Physical Evidence Technology of Chongqing Universities, Chongqing 401120, China; 2. The People Procuratorate of Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2019-08-15 Published:2020-12-25 Online:2020-12-25

PDF

摘要： 司法证明活动中裁判者通常会面临技术事实认定问题，法官专业技术瓶颈所造成的认知与判断障碍致生技术事实审理困境。当今我国知识产权法院设置的技术调查官制度，以科学的定位、全程性的技术评价与组织、合理的职能配置，使得裁判者在不影响其职权行使的同时，借助于技术专家的全程辅助，明晓、提炼认知盲区所隐含的要件事实，从而较好地弥补证据调查和诉讼证明所推进的诉讼程序短板。技术调查官制度所体现的优势，应当具有足够的活力和张性，通过知识产权法院的运行和经验总结，可以作为技术事实调查制度实践探索的重要参照。独立、居中的技术调查官制度与司法鉴定保持良好的衔接，同时促进司法鉴定领域规范化进程。

关键词: 技术事实认定；技术调查官；司法证明；司法鉴定；技术评价

Abstract: Judges usually face the problem of fact identification in judicial certification activities, cognitive and judgmental disorders due to judges’ professional technology bottleneck often cause dilemma of factual recognition. Nowadays ,the Technical Investigation Official System set up in intellectual property courts has the following advantages: scientific positioning, whole-process technical evaluation, reasonable allocation of functions. With the help of technical experts, these advantages help judges to understand the important facts hidden in the fade zone without influencing the exercise of the judges’ authority, thus making up the procedural gap of evidence investigation and litigation certification. Advantages embodied in the Technical Investigation Official System should have sufficient vitality and strength, according to the operation and experience of the intellectual property courts, this system can be used as an important reference for the practical exploration of technical fact investigation systems.Proper connection of independent and neutral Technical Investigation Officer System and forensic appraisal can promote the standardization process in the field of forensic appraisal.

Key words: fact recognition; technical investigation official; judicial certificate; forensic appraisal; technical evaluation

中图分类号: