主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2025 ›› Issue (1): 10-18.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2025.01.002

• Special Topic Discussion: Study on the Integrated Development Path of Forensic Appraisal in the Mode • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Practice Exploration and System Improvement of the Development of Integration of Appraisal and Mediation

ZHAO Chaoqin   

  1. School of Criminal Justice, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • Received:2024-09-19 Published:2025-01-15 Online:2025-01-15

鉴定与调解融合发展的实践探索和制度完善

赵朝琴   

  1. 河南财经政法大学 刑事司法学院,河南 郑州 450046
  • 作者简介:赵朝琴(1966—),女,教授,博士,博士研究生导师,主要从事诉讼法方向司法制度、法律文书等研究。E-mail:zhitongluoma@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目(21&ZD205)

Abstract: The integration of appraisal and mediation refers to the integration of pre-litigation appraisal and pre-litigation mediation. The development of integration of appraisal and mediation is an innovative attempt to adhere to and develop the “Fengqiao Experience” in the new era, and it should follow the principles of consensus, suitability and integration. Various regions have carried out diversified explorations in the field of integration of appraisal and mediation, laying a good foundation for the system improvement of the the procedures of integration. The implementation of the Supreme People’s Court’s Working Regulations on Entrusted Appraisal in Pre-litigation Mediation (Trial Implementation) has played an important role in integrating public legal service resources and promoting the construction of the public legal service system. The specific presentation of the integration of appraisal and mediation in the litigation process can be directly observed in some effective judgment documents. The relevant facts, evidence and law application have been clearly expressed in the parties’ submissions, the focus of disputes, the reasoning of the judgment and other parts of such effective judgment documents. In response to the practical needs of the integrated development, and aiming at the existing problems in the development of the integration, such as the unclear basic positioning, the unclear conditions and functions, the insufficient synergy of procedures, and the imperfect evaluation mechanism, it is proposed to formulate a special judicial interpretation on the integration, to clarify the basic positioning of the leading role of people’s courts  and the judicial administrative organs’ participation, to integrate the main functions and double review conditions of the legal service entities, to standardize series procedures of the integration, and to precisely design the evaluation mechanism for the integration.

Key words: integration of appraisal and mediation, principle, function, synergy, procedure

摘要: 鉴调融合是指诉前鉴定与诉前调解的融合,鉴调融合发展是坚持和发展新时代“枫桥经验”的创新尝试,应遵循一致同意原则、适宜性原则和一体化原则。各地在鉴调融合方面进行了多样化探索,为鉴调融合的制度完善奠定了良好基础;最高人民法院《关于诉前调解中委托鉴定工作规程(试行)》等的实施,对融通公共法律服务资源、推进公共法律服务体系建设发挥了重要作用;透过生效裁判文书可以直接观察鉴调融合在诉讼过程中的具体呈现,如诉辩意见、争议焦点、判决说理等部分都有对鉴调融合相关事实、证据、法律适用的清晰表达。因应鉴调融合发展的现实需求,针对其存在的基本定位不够明确、条件与职能不够清晰、程序不够协同、评价机制不够完善等问题,建议制定专门的鉴调融合司法解释,明确人民法院主导、司法行政机关参与的基本定位,整合法律服务主体的主要职能与双重审查条件,一体规范鉴调融合程序,精准设计鉴调融合评价机制。

关键词: 鉴调融合, 原则, 职能, 协同, 程序

CLC Number: