Abstract: The improvement of forensic appraisal legislation is fundamental for the sound and unified management system of forensic appraisal in China, but current regulations cannot fulfil this task. On September 7, 2023, the Legislative Plan of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress was released, and the Forensic Appraisal Law was listed as a second category item. The way the main content and framework structure of the Forensic Appraisal Law should be arranged needs comparative research, apart from analysis based on China’s specific circumstances. The achievements of forensic appraisal legislation and reform in the United Kingdom in recent years are of considerable reference value. China currently lacks a genuine legal entity capable of uniformly managing the forensic appraisal industry, and the implementation procedures and quality requirements of forensic appraisal are relatively separated. In future  legislation, efforts should be made to reach common understanding, establish a statutory forensic appraisal regulator, optimize norms of forensic procedures, explore the integration of  quality standards into implementation procedures, and develop forensic appraisal standards based on disciplines rather than administrative departments.

Key words: forensic appraisal, legislative model, legislative reform, United Kingdom

摘要： 司法鉴定立法的完善，是健全我国统一司法鉴定管理体制的根本保障，而现行司法鉴定法规无法完成该任务。2023年9月7日，《十四届全国人大常委会立法规划》发布，《司法鉴定法》作为第二类项目被列入立法事项。《司法鉴定法》的主要内容和框架结构应当如何安排，除了要立足本国国情具体分析，还需要进行比较研究。近年来，英国司法鉴定立法和改革成果颇具参考价值。我国至今尚无真正的法律实体可统一管理司法鉴定行业，且鉴定实施程序与质量要求相对分离。未来立法工作中，应当尽全力取得共识，确立统一管理主体，优化鉴定程序规范，探索将质量标准融入实施程序中，分学科而不是分部门制定鉴定标准。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 立法模式, 立法改革, 英国