主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2024 ›› Issue (2): 79-88.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2024.02.011

• 鉴定论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

鉴定意见审查的实质化实现——以电子数据鉴定意见为例

洪 涛   

  1. 浙江大学 光华法学院,浙江 杭州 310008
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-03 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-03-16
  • 作者简介:洪涛(1998—),男,博士研究生,主要从事诉讼法学、数字法学研究。E-mail:ht1159925287@126.com

On the Substantive Realization of Appraisal Opinion Review——Taking Electronic Data Appraisal Opinion as an Example

HONG Tao   

  1. Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310008, China
  • Received:2023-07-03 Published:2024-03-15 Online:2024-03-16

摘要: “检材+专门性知识+司法鉴定人主观判断”的生成结构不但没有降低鉴定意见的审查难度,反而造成难度叠加的困境。以电子数据鉴定意见为例进行实证分析,发现鉴定意见的采纳率极高,存在检材审查架空鉴定意见审查、以补充鉴定或重新鉴定代替鉴定意见审查等形式化问题。究其根本,主要是由于知识鸿沟造成审查壁垒以及技术标准缺失导致审查失去尺度等问题。鉴定意见的实质化审查,需明确鉴定意见并非结论、司法鉴定人的客观中立性需审查、鉴定意见具有可质性等正确观念。从实质化审查的内容要求上看,不仅要逐一审查司法鉴定人是否具备资质、鉴定委托是否合法、鉴定技术是否可靠等要点,还应增设鉴定意见庭前开示制度,建立健全出庭作证制度,优化司法技术辅助制度并确立法官专门性知识培训制度。

关键词: 鉴定意见, 知识鸿沟, 证据审查

Abstract: The structure of “inspection materials+specialized knowledge+subjective judgment of forensic appraiser”does not decrease the difficulty of appraisal opinion review, but caused increased predicament of superposition instead. Take electronic data appraisal opinion as an example of empirical analysis, it can be found that the adoption rate of appraisal opinions is very high. There exist the problems of samples review replacing appraisal opinion review,supplemental appraisal or re-appraisal taking the place of the appraisal opinion review. At its root, the formation of the barriers is mainly caused by knowledge gap, and the lack of technical standards leading to the loss of review scale. In the substantive review of the appraisal opinion, it should be clear that appraisal opinion is not a conclusion,the objective neutrality of the appraisal still needs to be reviewed, and the appraisal opinion may be cross-examined.For the substantive content review, it should not only be reviewed that every appraiser is qualified, the appraisal commission is legal, the appraisal technology is reliable, but also the pre-trial appraisal opinion disclosure system should be added. We should also establish a sound system of testifying in court, improve the forensic technical assistance system and set up a specialized knowledge training system for judges.

Key words: appraisal opinion, knowledge gap, evidence review

中图分类号: