主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2021 ›› Issue (5): 32-46.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2021.05.004

• 专题研讨:司法鉴定公信力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

司法鉴定公信力的反思及破解的制度机制选择

朱晋峰,吴何坚   

  1. 司法鉴定科学研究院 上海市法医学重点实验室 上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台 司法部司法鉴定重点实验室,上海 200063
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-26 出版日期:2021-09-30 发布日期:2021-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 吴何坚(1965—),男,主任法医师,主要从事司法鉴定管理和标准化研究。E-mail:wuhj@ssfjd.cn
  • 作者简介:朱晋峰(1987—),男,副编审,助理研究员,主要从事诉讼法学研究。E-mail:fengchsfjd@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家法治与法学理论研究课题(18SFB2025);上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目(21DZ2270800);上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目(19DZ2292700)。

Reflection on the Credibility of Forensic Appraisal and Choice of Resolving System Mechanism

ZHU Jinfeng, WU Hejian   

  1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Key Laboratory of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, China
  • Received:2021-07-26 Published:2021-09-30 Online:2021-12-18

摘要: 作为自然科学技术运用到诉讼中解决事实问题的典型代表,司法鉴定对于促进司法现代化、司法公正发挥了关键作用,诉讼各方赋予了鉴定意见极大的信任,但随着问题的不断暴露,司法鉴定也饱受各界诟病。如何重新确立司法鉴定公信力,除了要在观念上重新正确认识司法鉴定的证据效力,避免“唯鉴定是从”的局面以外,还需要从管理模式、管理范围、管理手段等管理角度,鉴定启动、鉴定实施等诉讼角度,鉴定人出庭、专家辅助人、鉴定意见认证等证据角度对司法鉴定公信力的提升进行宏观考察。同时,还应当重新诠释当事人鉴定申请权的行使、鉴定技术标准的运用以及鉴定意见采信的基本模式等在理论和实务界存在的微观误区。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 司法鉴定管理, 鉴定意见, 证据采信, 公信力

Abstract: As a typical representative of applying natural science and technology to solve factual problems in litigation, forensic appraisal has played a key role in promoting judicial modernization and forensic justice. The parties to the litigation have given great trust in appraisal opinions. However, as problems continue to be exposed, it has also been criticized by all walks of life. To re-establish the credibility of forensic appraisal, in addition to a correct understanding of the evidence validity of forensic appraisal in terms of concepts and avoiding the situation of “following appraisal only”, it is also necessary to observe appraisal from the management perspectives such as management mode, management scope, and management methods, and from the perspective of litigation such as appraisal initiation, appraisal implementation, and from evidence perspectives such as appearance of appraisers, expert assistants, and authentication of appraisal opinions, so as to improve forensic appraisal credibility. At the same time, it is necessary to reinterpret some concepts such as the enforcement of the party’s right to apply for appraisal, the application of technical standards of appraisal, and the basic mode of admissibility of appraisal opinion, so as to correct the microscopic misunderstandings in the theoretical and practical circles.

Key words: forensic appraisal, forensic appraisal management, appraisal opinion, evidence admissibility, credibility

中图分类号: